Reframing the (False?) Choice Between Purchaser Welfare and Total Welfare

نویسنده

  • Alan J. Meese
چکیده

This Article critiques the role that the partial equilibrium trade-off paradigm plays in the debate over the definition of " consumer welfare " that courts should employ when developing and applying antitrust doctrine. The Article contends that common reliance on the paradigm distorts the debate between those who would equate " consumer welfare " with " total welfare " and those who equate consumer welfare with " purchaser welfare. " In particular, the model excludes, by fiat, the fact that new efficiencies free up resources that flow to other markets, increasing output and thus the welfare of purchasers in those markets. Moreover, the model also assumes that both the positive and negative impacts of a transaction are permanent and occur immediately and simultaneously. As a result, the model excludes the (very real) possibility that subsequent entry will undermine or mitigate any market power, leaving only efficiencies that benefit purchasers in the original market. Removal of these unrealistic assumptions requires the antitrust community to reframe the debate about the appropriate welfare standard for antitrust and could require adjustment of the standards applied to practices that both raise prices and create efficiencies in the relevant market. For instance, recognition that efficiencies generated in one market cause resource flows to other markets and higher output in such markets undermines claims that producers " pocket " efficiencies whenever a practice results in higher prices. Thus, instead of involving a conflict between " producers " and " purchasers " in a single market, transactions that both raise prices and create efficiencies require antitrust policy to resolve a conflict between purchasers in the original market, on the one hand, and those in other markets, on the other. In the same way, the realization that the trade-off model ignores the passage of time requires antitrust policy to resolve a conflict between current and future purchasers in the original market.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Welfare Effects of Trade Liberalization in Colombia: Evidence from the Car Industry

Trade liberalization as part of the globalization process was encouraged in many Latin American countries during the eighties and nineties. Colombia joined this process in 1991. Using product level data, I examine the effect of trade liberalization in the Colombian automobile industry. The discrete choice methodology that I use allows me to estimate consumer welfare and evaluate firms’ performa...

متن کامل

Exploring inequities in child welfare and protective services: explaining the ‘inverse intervention law’

(2015) Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services: explaining the 'inverse intervention law', Children and Youth Services Review, 57, pp. 98-105. ABSTRACT Attempts to record, understand and respond to variations in child welfare and protection reporting, service patterns and outcomes are international, numerous and longstanding. Reframing such variations as an issue of ...

متن کامل

The Welfare Effects of Endogenous Quality Choice in Cable Television Markets∗

We measure the welfare consequences of endogenous quality choice in imperfectly competitive markets. We introduce the concept of a “quality markup” and measure the relative importance for welfare of market power over price versus market power over quality. For U.S. cable-television markets between 1997-2006, we find that prices are 33% to 74% higher and qualities 23% to 55% higher than socially...

متن کامل

Immigration, Legal Status, and Public Aid Magnets

Legal and illegal immigrants are concentrated in U.S. border states. This paper asks to what extent geographic clustering is attributable to differences in state-provided public aid. California has been shown to have a disproportionate number of legal immigrant welfare users, but little evidence exists concerning illegal persons. Illegal immigrants may collect welfare benefits on behalf of lega...

متن کامل

Aggregation of binary evaluations for truth-functional agendas

In the problem of judgment aggregation, a panel of judges has to evaluate each proposition in a given agenda as true or false, based on their individual evaluations and subject to the constraint of logical consistency. We elaborate on the relation between this and the problem of aggregating abstract binary evaluations. For the special case of truth-functional agendas we have the following main ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015